UROGENITAL RADIOLOGY / ORIGINAL PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
To evaluate the extent to which magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) lipid metabolites are accurate in predicting high-grade cervical cancer.

Material and methods:
This prospective single-centre pilot study included 20 cases with pathologically proven cervical cancer. They underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with MRS. Two radiologists, blinded to the histopathological results, with 10 years of experience in gynaecological imaging, independently analysed the MRI images and MRS curves, and a third one resolved any disagreement. Using the histopathological results as a standard test, the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was utilised to calculate the optimal lipid peak (1.3 ppm) cutoff for predicting high-grade cervical cancer. The difference in MRS metabolites between low- and high-grade cervical cancer groups was estimated using the Mann-Whitney test.

Results:
The study included 11 high-grade and nine low-grade cervical cancer cases based on the histopathological evaluation. A lipid (1.3 ppm) peak of 29.9 was the optimal cutoff for predicting high-grade cervical cancer with 100% sensitivity, 77.8%, specificity, and 90% accuracy. Moreover, there was a significant difference between low- and high-grade cervical cancer cases concerning lipid peak at 0.9 ppm, lipid peak at 1.3 ppm, and the peak of choline with (p-value 0.025, 0.001, and 0.023), respectively.

Conclusions:
MRS might be considered a useful imaging technique for assessing the grade of cervical cancer and improving the planning of treatment. It shows a good diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, it can be adopted in clinical practice for better patient outcome.

 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Brisson M, Kim JJ, Canfell K, Drolet M, Gingras G, Burger EA, et al. Impact of HPV vaccination and cervical screening on cervical cancer elimination: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Lancet 2010; 395: 575-590.
 
2.
Manganaro L, Lakhman Y, Bharwani N, Gui B, Gigli S, Vinci V, et al. Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: updated guidelines of the European Society of Uroge­nital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 7802-7816.
 
3.
Satta S, Dolciami M, Celli V, Di Stadio F, Perniola G, Palaia I, et al. Quantitative diffusion and perfusion MRI in the evaluation of endometrial cancer: validation with histopathological parameters. Br J Radiol 2021; 94: 20210054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20... 054.
 
4.
Snaebjornsson MT, Janaki-Raman S, Schulze A. Greasing the wheels of the cancer machine: the role of lipid metabolism in cancer. Cell Metab 2020; 31: 62-76.
 
5.
Li YJ, Fahrmann JF, Aftabizadeh M, Zhao Q, Tripathi SC, Zhang C, et al. Fatty acid oxidation protects cancer cells from apoptosis by increasing mitochondrial membrane lipids. Cell Rep 2022; 39: 110870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celr....
 
6.
Dolciami M, Canese R, Testa C, Pernazza A, Santangelo G, Palaia I, et al. The contribution of the 1H-MRS lipid signal to cervical cancer prognosis: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol Exp 2022; 6: 47. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-022-00300-1.
 
7.
Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2020; 8: e191-e203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-....
 
8.
Saleh M, Virarkar M, Javadi S, Elsherif SB, de Castro Faria S, Bhosale P. Cervical cancer: 2018 revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system and the role of imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 214: 1182-1195.
 
9.
Stoler M, Bergeron C, Colgan TJ. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014, pp. 169-189.
 
10.
Matani H, Patel AK, Horne ZD, Beriwal S. Utilization of functional MRI in the diagnosis and management of cervical cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 1030967. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1030967.
 
11.
Mahon MM, deSouza NM, Dina R, Soutter WP, McIndoe GA, Williams AD, et al. Preinvasive and invasive cervical cancer: an ex vivo proton magic angle spinning magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. NMR Biomed 2004; 17: 144-153.
 
12.
Delikatny EJ, Russell P, Hunter JC, Hancock R, Atkinson KH, van Haaften-Day C, et al. Proton MR and human cervical neoplasia: ex vivo spectroscopy allows distinction of invasive carcinoma of the cervix from carcinoma in situ and other preinvasive lesions. Radio­logy 1993; 188: 791-796.
 
13.
Mahon MM, Cox IJ, Dina R, Soutter WP, McIndoe GA, Williams AD, et al. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of preinvasive and invasive cervical cancer: in vivo-ex vivo profiles and effect of tumor load. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 356-364.
 
14.
Allen JR, Prost RW, Griffith OW, Erickson SJ, Erickson BA. In vivo proton (H1) magnetic resonance spectroscopy for cervical carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2001; 24: 522-529.
 
15.
Lee JH, Cho KS, Kim YM, Kim ST, Mun CW, Na JH, et al. Loca­lized in vivo 1H nuclear MR spectroscopy for evaluation of human uterine cervical carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 1279-1282.
 
16.
Mahon MM, Williams AD, Soutter WP, Cox IJ, McIndoe GA, Coutts GA, et al. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of invasive cervical cancer: an in vivo study with ex vivo corroboration. NMR Biomed 2004; 17: 1-9.
 
17.
Lin G, Lai CH, Tsai SY, Lin YC, Huang YT, Wu RC, et al. 1H MR spectroscopy in cervical carcinoma using external phase array body coil at 3.0 Tesla: prediction of poor prognostic human papillomavirus genotypes. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 45: 899-907.
 
18.
Satta S, Dolciami M, Celli V, Di Stadio F, Perniola G, Palaia I, et al. Quantitative diffusion and perfusion MRI in the evaluation of endometrial cancer: validation with histopathological parameters. Br J Radiol 2021; 94: 20210054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20....
 
19.
Lehnhardt FG, RÖhn G, Ernestus RI, Grüne M, Hoehn M. 1H- and 31P-MR spectroscopy of primary and recurrent human brain tumours in vitro: malignancy-characteristic profiles of water soluble and lipophilic spectral components. NMR Biomed 2001; 14: 307-317.
 
20.
Mountford CE, Wright LC. Organization of lipids in the plasma membranes of malignant and stimulated cells: a new model. Trends Biochem Sci 1998; 13: 172-177.
 
21.
Callies R, Sri-Pathmanathan RM, Ferguson DY, Brindle KM, et al. The appearance of neutral lipid signals in the 1H NMR spectra of a myeloma cell line correlates with the induced formation of cytoplasmic lipid droplets. Magn Reson Med 1993; 29: 546-550.
 
22.
Barba I, Cabanas ME, Arus C. The relationship between nuclear magnetic resonance-visible lipids, lipid droplets and cell proliferation in cultured C6 cells. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 1861-1868.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top