GASTROINTESTINAL AND ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY / ORIGINAL PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Diagnosis of perianal fistula represents a challenge for surgeons. It is well known that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in that. The new 3D MRI sequence VISTA (Volume ISotopic Turbo spin echo Acquisition) can improve detection and characterization of perianal fistula compared with two-dimensional (2D) sequences. The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the new 3D MRI sequence VISTA with the widely routinely used T2 FSE pulse sequence in depiction and characterization of perianal fistula by using the contrast-enhanced (CE) 3D T1 sequence THRIVE (T1-weighted high-resolution isotropic volume examination) as a reference standard.

Material and methods:
Forty adult patients were enrolled in this prospective study. They underwent MRI perianal region examination using routine T2 TSE and CE 3D T1 sequence THRIVE with addition of the new 3D MRI sequence VISTA. T2, 3D VISTA and (CE) 3D T1 sequence THRIVE images were evaluated by two radiologists separately for detection and characterization of perianal fistula, then comparison between of T2 and 3D VISTA sequences was done using (CE) 3D T1 sequence THRIVE as a reference. Each sequence sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated by both readers.

Results:
For reader 1, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 92.5%, 90.5% and 93.6% for 3D VISTA and 84.1%, 83.7% and 87.3% for T2 FSE. For reader 2, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 91.5%, 92.8% and 94.8% for 3D VISTA and 82.9%, 84.5% and 86.7% for T2 FSE.

Conclusions:
Using CE 3D T1 sequence THRIVE as the reference standard, 3D VISTA pulse sequence on the perianal region has better diagnostic performance in the detection and characterization of perianal fistula as compared to the routinely used T2 FSE sequence.

 
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Erden A. MRI of anal canal: normal anatomy, imaging protocol, and perianal fistulas: part 1. Abdom Radiol 2018; 43: 1334-1352.
 
2.
Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J III, Hyman N, Buie WD, Cohen J, Orsay C, et al.; Standards Practice Task Force American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1337-1342.
 
3.
Criado JM, del Salto LG, Rivas PF, del Hoyo LFA, Velasco LG, de las Vacas MIDP, et al. MRI imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics 2012; 32: 175-194.
 
4.
Sharma G, Khandige G, Mohan M. Magnetic resonance imaging in perianal fistulasda pictorial atlas. Indian J Gastroenterol 2016; 35: 337-342.
 
5.
Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano. Radiology 2006; 239: 18-33.
 
6.
Michalopoulos A, Papadopoulos V, Tziris N, Apostolidis S. Perianal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 2010; 14 Suppl 1: S15-S17.
 
7.
Morris J, Spencer J, Ambrose N. MRI imaging classification of peri­anal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics 2000; 20: 623-637.
 
8.
Terra MP, Beets-Tan RGH, van Der Hulst VPM, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bossuyt PMM, Dobben AC, et al. Anal sphincter defects in patients with fecal incontinence: endoanal versus external phased-array MRI imaging. Radiology 2005; 236: 886-895.
 
9.
Choudhary J, Kaushal L, Rajput P. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of perianal fistula. Int J Sci Stud 2020; 8: 90-94.
 
10.
Visscher AP, Felt-Bersma RJ. Endoanal ultrasound in perianal fistulae and abscesses. Ultrasound Q 2015; 31: 130-137.
 
11.
Zand KR, Reinhold C, Haider MA, Nakai A, Rohoman L, Maheshwari S. Artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the pelvis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 480-497.
 
12.
Kim H, Lim JS, Choi JY, Park J, Chung JE, Kim MJ, et al. Rectal cancer: comparison of accuracy of local-regional staging with two- and three-dimensional preoperative 3-T MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 254: 485-492.
 
13.
Park HJ, Lee SY, Choi YJ, Hong HP, Park SJ, Park JH, et al. 3D isotropic T2-weighted fast spin echo (VISTA) versus 2D T2-weighted fast spin echo in evaluation of the calcaneofibular ligament in the oblique coronal plane. Clin Radiol 2017; 72: 176.e1-176.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.023.
 
14.
Park HJ, Lee SY, Park NH, Ahn JH, Chung EC, Kim SJ, et al. Three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted fast spin-echo (VISTA) knee MRI at 3.0 T in the evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament injury with additional views: comparison with two-dimensional fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences. Acta Radiol 2016; 57: 1372-1379.
 
15.
Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 1976; 63: 1-12.
 
16.
Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS. MR imaging classification of peri­anal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiogra­phics 2000; 20: 623-635.
 
17.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for cate­gorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174.
 
18.
Horsthuis K, Lavini C, Bipat S, Stokkers PCF, Stoker J. Perianal Crohn disease: evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI imaging as an indicator of disease activity. Radiology 2009; 251: 380-387.
 
19.
Jhaveri KS, Thipphavong S, Guo L, Harisinghani MG. MRI imaging of perianal fistulas. Radiol Clin North Am 2018; 56: 775-789.
 
20.
Merkle EM, Dale BM, Paulson EK. Abdominal MR imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006; 14: 17-26.
 
21.
Kwon JW, Yoon YC, Choi SH. Three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted cervical MRI at 3T: comparison with two dimensional T2-weighted sequences. Clin Radiol 2012; 67: 106-113.
 
22.
Zheng ZZ, Shan H, Li X. Fat-suppressed 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the cartilage with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: W414-W419.
 
23.
Sahnan K, Adegbola SO, Tozer PJ, Patel U, Ilangovan R, Warusavitarne J, et al. Innovation in the imaging perianal fistula: a step towards persona­lised medicine. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2018; 11: 1756284818775060. DOI: 10.1177/1756284818775060.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top