BREAST RADIOLOGY / REVIEW PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
Early detection of breast cancer is crucial for improving patient outcomes. With advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), there is growing interest in its potential to assist radiologists in interpreting mammograms for early cancer detection. AI algorithms offer the promise of increased accuracy and efficiency in identifying subtle signs of breast cancer, potentially complementing the expertise of radiologists and enhancing the screening process for early-stage breast cancer detection.

Material and Methods:
A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and select original research reports on breast cancer diagnosis by artificial intelligence versus conventional radiologists in using mammograms in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were analysed with Review Manager version 5.4. P-value and I2 were used to test the significance of differences.

Results:
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 8 studies with data from a total of 120,950 patients. Regarding the sensitivity of AI, the pooled analysis of 6 studies with sensitivities ranging from 0.70 to 0.89 yielded a sensitivity of 0.85. However, the sensitivity of the radiologists ranged from 0.63 to 0.85, with an overall sensitivity of 0.77. As for specificity, both radiologists and AI groups had closer results.

Conclusions:
The comparison between AI systems and radiologists in detecting early-stage breast cancer from mammograms highlights the potential of AI as a valuable tool in breast cancer screening. While AI algorithms have shown promising results in terms of accuracy and efficiency, they should be viewed as complementary to radiologists rather than replacements.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Warrier S, Tapia G, Goltsman D, Beith J.. An update in breast cancer screening and management. Womens Health (Lond) 2016; 12: 229-239.
 
2.
Jones MA, Islam W, Faiz R, Chen X, Zheng B. Applying artificial intelligence technology to assist with breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 980793. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.980793.
 
3.
Al-Karawi D, Al-Zaidi S, Helael KA, Obeidat N, Mouhsen AM, Ajam T, et al. A review of artificial intelligence in breast imaging. Tomography 2024; 10: 705-726.
 
4.
Shah R, Rosso K, Nathanson SD. Pathogenesis, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2014; 5: 283-298.
 
5.
Madani M, Behzadi MM, Nabavi S. The role of artificial intelligence in advancing breast cancer detection using different imaging modali­ties: a systematic review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14: 5334. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215334.
 
6.
Schaffter T, Buist DSM, Lee CI, Nikulin Y, Ribli D, Guan Y, et al. Evaluation of combined artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment to interpret screening mammograms. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e200265. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0265.
 
7.
Morgan MB, Mates JL. Applications of artificial intelligence in breast imaging. Radiol Clin N Am 2021; 59: 139-148.
 
8.
Zhang Q, Song S, Xiao Y, Chen S, Shi J, Zheng H. Dual-mode artificially-intelligent diagnosis of breast tumours in shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound using deep polynomial networks. Med Eng Phys 2019; 64: 1-6.
 
9.
Cè M, Caloro E, Pellegrino ME, Basile M, Sorce A, Fazzini D, et al. Artificial intelligence in breast cancer imaging: risk stratification, lesion detection and classification, treatment planning and prognosis – a narrative review. Explor Target Antitumor Ther 2022; 3: 795-816.
 
10.
Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J, et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1675-1684.
 
11.
Choi WJ, An JK, Woo JJ, Kwak HY. Comparison of diagnostic performance in mammography assessment: radiologist with reference to clinical information versus standalone artificial intelligence detection. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 13: 117. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics­13010117.
 
12.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Lång K, Gubern-Merida A, Broeders M, Gen­naro G, Clauser P, et al. Stand-alone artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: comparison with 101 radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111: 916-922.
 
13.
Dembrower K, Wåhlin E, Liu Y, Salim M, Smith K, Lindholm P, et al. Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: A retrospective simulation study. Lancet Digit Health 2020; 2: e468-e474. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30185-0.
 
14.
Al-Obaidi MN, Al-Obaidi AD, Hashim HT, Al Sakini AS, Abd AM, Rashed RH, et al. Assessing breast self-examination knowledge and practices among women in Iraq: a cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep 2024; 7: e2137. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2137.
 
15.
Hashim HT, et al. Assessment of breast cancer risk among Iraqi women in 2019. BMC Womens Health 2021; 21: 412. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01557-1.
 
16.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Lång K, Gubern-Merida A, Broeders M, Gennaro G, Clauser P, et al. Stand-alone artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography: comparison with 101 radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111: 916-922.
 
17.
Kim HE, Kim HH, Han BK, Kim KH, Han K, Nam H, et al. Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study. Lancet Digit Health 2020; 2: e138-e148. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30003-0.
 
18.
Salim M, Wåhlin E, Dembrower K, Azavedo E, Foukakis T, Liu Y, et al. External evaluation of 3 commercial artificial intelligence algorithms for independent assessment of screening mammograms. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6: 1581-1588.
 
19.
Watanabe AT, Lim V, Vu HX, Chim R, Weise E, Liu J, et al. Improved cancer detection using artificial intelligence: a retrospective evaluation of missed cancers on mammography. J Digit Imaging 2019; 32: 625-637.
 
20.
Lauritzen AD, Rodríguez-Ruiz A, von Euler-Chelpin MC, Lynge E, Vejborg I, Nielsen M, et al. An artificial intelligence-based mammography screening protocol for breast cancer: outcome and radio­logist workload. Radiology 2022; 304: 41-49.
 
21.
Akselrod-Ballin A, Chorev M, Shoshan Y, Spiro A, Hazan A, Melamed R, Barkan E, et al. Predicting breast cancer by applying deep learning to linked health records and mammograms. Radiology 2019; 292: 331-342.
 
22.
Lee JH, Kim KH, Lee EH, Ahn JS, Ryu JK, Park YM, et al. Improving the performance of radiologists using artificial intelligence-based detection support software for mammography: a multi-reader study. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23: 505-216.
 
23.
Rodríguez-Ruiz A, Krupinski E, Mordang JJ, Schilling K, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Sechopoulos I, Mann RM. Detection of breast cancer with mammography: effect of an artificial intelligence support system. Radiology 2016; 290: 305-314.
 
24.
Sickles EA, Wolverton DE, Dee KE. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 2002; 224: 861-869.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top