NEURORADIOLOGY / ORIGINAL PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to assess the activity of motor cortical areas and the resting brain activity in a group of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients compared to a group of healthy individuals according to task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (t-fMRI), resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), and volumetric MRI studies.

Material and methods:
The study enrolled 28 MS patients and 20 healthy volunteers who underwent MRI examinations. Primary motor cortex (M1), premotor area (PMA), supplementary motor area, as well as resting state networks (RSN’s) and volumes of selected brain structures were subjected to a detailed analysis.

Results:
In MS patients, a motor task more often resulted in the activation of ipsilateral M1 cortex (observed in 39% of the studied group) as well as the PMA cortex (observed in 32% of MS patients). No differences in resting brain activity were found between the studied groups. Significant differences were observed in volumetric parameters of the total brain volume (healthy volunteers vs. MS patients, respectively): (1197 cm³ vs. 1150 cm³) and volumes of the grey matter (517 cm³ vs. 481 cm³), cerebellum (150 cm³ vs. 136 cm³), thalamus (16.3 cm³ vs. 12.6 cm³), putamen (8.9 cm³ vs. 7.7 cm³), and globus pallidus (4.57 cm³ vs. 3.57 cm³).

Conclusions:
In the MS patients, the motor task required significantly more frequent activation of the primary and secondary ipsilateral motor cortex compared to the group of healthy volunteers. The rs-fMRI study showed no differences in activity patterns within the RSN’s. Differences in the total cerebral volume and the volume of the grey matter, cerebellum, thalamus, putamen, and globus pallidus were observed.

 
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Rocca M, Schoonheim M, Valsasina P , Geurts JJG, Filippi M. Task- and resting-state fMRI studies in multiple sclerosis: from regions to systems and time-varying analysis. Current status and future perspective. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 35: 103076. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103076.
 
2.
Cordani C, de la Cruz H, Meani A, Valsasina P, Esposito F, Pagani E, et al. MRI correlates of clinical disability and hand-motor performance in multiple sclerosis phenotypes. Mult Scler 2021; 27: 1205-1221.
 
3.
Filippi M, Preziosa P, Rocca MA. Brain mapping in multiple sclerosis: lessons learned about the human brain. Neuroimage 2019; 190: 32-45.
 
4.
Romanello A, Krohn S, von Schwanenflug N, Chien C, Bellmann-Strobl J, Ruprecht K, et al. Functional connectivity dynamics reflect disability and multi-domain clinical impairment in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis Neuroimage Clin 2022; 36: 103203. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103203.
 
5.
Pressman P, Rosen HJ. Chapter 33: Disorders of frontal lobe function. In: Neurobiology of Brain Disorders. Zigmond MJ, Rowland LP, Coyle JT (eds.). Academic Press; 2015, pp. 542-557.
 
6.
Rocca MA, Mezzapesa DM, Falini A, Ghezzi A, Martinelli V, Scotti G, et al. Evidence for axonal pathology and adaptive cortical reorganization in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2003; 18: 847-855.
 
7.
Filippi M, Rocca MA, Mezzapesa DM, Ghezzi A, Falini A, Marti­nelli V, et al. Simple and complex movement-associated functional MRI changes in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2004; 21: 108-117.
 
8.
Wegner C, Filippi M, Korteweg T, Beckmann C, Ciccarelli O, De Stefano N, et al. Relating functional changes during hand movement to clinical parameters in patients with multiple sclerosis in a multi-centre fMRI study. Eur J Neurol 2008; 15: 113-122.
 
9.
Hulst HE, Schoonheim MM, Roosendaal SD, Popescu V, Schweren LJS, van der Werf YD, et al. Functional adaptive changes within the hippocampal memory system of patients with multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2012; 33: 2268-2280.
 
10.
Penner IK, Rausch M, Kappos L, Opwis K, Radü EW. Analysis of impairment related functional architecture in MS patients during performance of different attention tasks. J Neurol 2003; 250: 461-472.
 
11.
Reddy H, Narayanan S, Arnoutelis R, Jenkinson M, Antel J, Matthews PM, Arnold DL. Evidence for adaptive functional changes in the cerebral cortex with axonal injury from multiple sclerosis. Brain 2000; 123 (Pt 1): 2314-2320.
 
12.
McKiernan KA, D’Angelo BR, Kaufman JN, Binder JR. Interrupting the ‘stream of consciousness’: an fMRI investigation. Neuroimage 2006; 29: 1185-1191.
 
13.
Roosendaal SD, Schoonheim MM, Hulst HE, Sanz-Arigita EJ, Smith SM, Geurts JJG, Barkhof F. Resting state networks change in clinically isolated syndrome. Brain 2010; 133 (Pt 6): 1612-1621.
 
14.
Fox RJ, Fisher E, Tkach J, Lee JC, Cohen JA, Rudick RA. Brain atrophy and magnetization transfer ratio following methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis: short-term changes and long-term implications. Mult Scler 2005; 11: 140-145.
 
15.
Morgen K, Sammer G, Courtney SM, Wolters T, Melchior H, Blec-ker CR, et al. Evidence for a direct association between cortical atrophy and cognitive impairment in relapsing-remitting MS. Neuro­image 2006; 30: 891-898.
 
16.
Filippi M, Rocca MA, Barkhof F, Brück W, Chen JT, Comi G, et al. Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11: 349-360.
 
17.
Sherman SM, Guillery RW. The role of the thalamus in the flow of information to the cortex. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci 2002; 357: 1695-1708.
 
18.
Svolgaard O, Andersen KW, Bauer C, Madsen KH, Blinkenberg M, Selleberg F, Siebner HR.. Cerebellar and premotor activity during a non-fatiguing grip task reflects motor fatigue in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0201162. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201162.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top