UROGENITAL RADIOLOGY / ORIGINAL PAPER
Diagnostic models for the detection of intrauterine growth restriction and placental insufficiency severity based on magnetic resonance imaging of the placenta
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Radiology, Women’s Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2
Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3
Department of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4
Department of Radiology, Amiralam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5
Maternal, Foetal and Neonatal Research Centre, Women’s Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6
Department of Radiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
7
School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Submission date: 2022-05-30
Final revision date: 2022-11-28
Acceptance date: 2022-12-23
Publication date: 2023-03-24
Pol J Radiol, 2023; 88: 155-164
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
We aimed to provide diagnostic models based on different parameters of placental magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), as well as the severity of placental insufficiency.
Material and methods:
We included 44 foetuses with appropriate weight for gestational age (AGA) and 46 foetuses with documented IUGR, defined as the estimated foetal weight (EFW) below the 10th centile. Using Doppler ultrasound, IUGR cases were divided into 2 groups: 1) IUGR with severity signs: EFW < 3rd centile, or cerebroplacental ratio < 5th centile, or abnormal umbilical/uterine artery pulsatility index; and 2) non-severe IUGR without any of this criterion. For all these participants, placental MRI was performed in the third gestational trimester, and its parameters were compared between AGA and IUGR, as well as between the severe and non-severe IUGR groups. Two diagnostic models consisting of significant predictors were developed, and their performance was investigated with accuracy metrics.
Results:
The severity signs were detected in 25 (54.3%) IUGR cases. The diagnostic model for the differentiation of IUGR from AGA revealed an acceptable performance (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.749) and consisted of 2 variables: 1) the largest size of infarct ≥ 25 mm (odds ratio [OR] = 5.01, p = 0.001), and 2) thickness : volume ratio ≥ 0.043 (OR = 3.76, p = 0.027); while, the logistic regression model for detection of the severity signs was even better, with AUC = 0.862, and comprised of 2 predictors: 1) placental infarct percent ≥ 10% (OR = 26.73, p = 0.004), and 2) placental globular shape (OR = 5.40, p = 0.034).
Conclusions:
Placental MRI parameters can differentiate IUGR from AGA, and more precisely, assess the severity of placental insufficiency in IUGR foetuses.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
von Beckerath AK, Kollmann M, Rotky-Fast C, et al. Perinatal complications and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 130.e1-6. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog....
2.
Lausman A, Kingdom J. Intrauterine growth restriction: screening, diagnosis, and management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013; 35: 741-748.
3.
Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Hanssens M. The uterine spiral arteries in human pregnancy: facts and controversies. Placenta 2006; 27: 939-958.
4.
Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 233-239.
5.
Boers KE, Vijgen SM, Bijlenga D, et al. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2010; 341: c7087. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c7....
6.
Backe B, Nakling J. Effectiveness of antenatal care: a population based study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 727-732.
7.
Devoe LD, Gardner P, Dear C, Faircloth D. The significance of increasing umbilical artery systolic-diastolic ratios in third-trimester pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 684-687.
8.
Powell MC, Buckley J, Price H, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 154: 565-569.
9.
Teo TH, Law YM, Tay KH, et al. Use of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of placental invasion. Clin Radiol 2009; 64: 511-516.
10.
Taillieu F, Salomon LJ, Siauve N, et al. Placental perfusion and permeability: simultaneous assessment with dual-echo contrast-enhanced MR imaging in mice. Radiology 2006; 241: 737-745.
11.
Linduska N, Dekan S, Messerschmidt A, et al. Placental pathologies in fetal MRI with pathohistological correlation. Placenta 2009; 30: 555-559.
12.
Bonel HM, Stolz B, Diedrichsen L, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the placenta in fetuses with placental insufficiency. Radiology 2010; 257: 810-819.
13.
Damodaram M, Story L, Eixarch E, et al. Placental MRI in intrauterine fetal growth restriction. Placenta 2010; 31: 491-498.
14.
Görkem SB, Coşkun A, Eşlik M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of placenta in intrauterine growth restriction with worsening Doppler US findings. Diagn Interv Radiol 2019; 25: 280-284.
15.
Goodyear MD, Krleza-Jeric K, Lemmens T. The Declaration of Helsinki. BMJ 2007; 335: 624-625.
16.
Kiserud T, Benachi A, Hecher K, et al. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218 (2 Suppl): S619-s629. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog....
17.
Ciobanu A, Wright A, Syngelaki A, et al. Fetal Medicine Foundation reference ranges for umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery pulsatility index and cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 465-472.
18.
Moradi B, Nezhad ZA, Saadat NS, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of different areas of brain in foetuses with intrauterine growth restriction. Pol J Radiol 2020; 85: e301-e308. doi:
https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.20....
19.
Chartier AL, Bouvier MJ, McPherson DR, et al. The Safety of Maternal and Fetal MRI at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213: 1170-1173.
20.
Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37: 501-530.
21.
Derwig I, Lythgoe DJ, Barker GJ, et al. Association of placental perfusion, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and uterine artery Doppler ultrasound, and its relationship to pregnancy outcome. Placenta 2013; 34: 885-891.
22.
Brunelli R, Masselli G, Parasassi T, et al. Intervillous circulation in intra-uterine growth restriction. Correlation to fetal well being. Placenta 2010; 31: 1051-1056.
23.
Sohlberg S, Mulic-Lutvica A, Olovsson M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-estimated placental perfusion in fetal growth assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 700-705.
24.
Biswas S, Ghosh SK. Gross morphological changes of placentas associated with intrauterine growth restriction of fetuses: a case control study. Early Hum Dev 2008; 84: 357-362.
25.
Kaufmann P, Black S, Huppertz B. Endovascular trophoblast invasion: implications for the pathogenesis of intrauterine growth retardation and preeclampsia. Biol Reprod 2003; 69: 1-7.
26.
Ishihara N, Matsuo H, Murakoshi H, et al. Increased apoptosis in the syncytiotrophoblast in human term placentas complicated by either preeclampsia or intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 158-166.
27.
Levy R, Smith SD, Yusuf K, et al. Trophoblast apoptosis from pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction is associated with enhanced p53 expression. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 1056-1061.
28.
Vişan V, Balan RA, Costea CF, et al. Morphological and histopathological changes in placentas of pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2020; 61: 477-483.
29.
Song F, Wu W, Qian Z, etal. Assessment of the Placenta in Intrauterine Growth Restriction by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Reprod Sci 2017; 24: 575-581.