MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY / REVIEW PAPER
Imaging features of the aging spine
1
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Gruca Teaching Hospital, Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, Otwock, Poland
2
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior in Warsaw, Poland
Submission date: 2020-08-10
Acceptance date: 2020-09-04
Publication date: 2021-06-24
Pol J Radiol, 2021; 86: 380-386
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Among many degenerative abnormalities commonly found in spine imaging, not all are associated with the patient’s symptoms. We aimed to assess features of the standard, asymptomatic aging process of the spine. In this narrative review, we emphasize studies that describe imaging features of the spine in asymptomatic populations of different age groups. Degeneration of the intervertebral discs, bulging, and facet joint arthropathy have been documented in almost 90% of asymptomatic patients over 60 years of age. After the age of 40 years, nearly all patients have anterior and lateral vertebral osteophytes, whereas posterior osteophytes are found in a minority of them. There is a gradual increase in vertebral bone marrow fat composition with age with the acceleration of this process in women after menopause. The prevalence of these findings is common in asymptomatic populations and varies depending on the patient’s age. It is essential to differentiate likely natural and age-related findings from pathological abnormalities to make an accurate diagnosis.
REFERENCES (60)
1.
Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 811-816.
2.
Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 403-408.
3.
Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Suda K, et al. Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of the cervical spines in 1211 asymptomatic subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015; 40: 392-398.
4.
Kushchayev SV, Glushko T, Jarraya M, et al. ABCs of the degenerative spine. Insights Imaging 2018; 9: 253-274.
5.
Sasiadek MJ, Bladowska J. Imaging of degenerative spine disease – the state of the art. Adv Clin Exp Med 2012; 21: 133-142.
6.
Wáng YXJ, Wu AM, Ruiz Santiago F, et al. Informed appropriate imaging for low back pain management: a narrative review. J Orthop Translat 2018; 15: 21-34.
7.
Humzah MD, Soames RW. Human intervertebral disc: structure and function. Anat Rec 1988; 220: 337-356.
8.
Del Grande F, Maus TP, Carrino JA. Imaging the intervertebral disk: age-related changes, herniations, and radicular pain. Radiol Clin North Am 2012; 50: 629-649.
9.
Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 1873-1878.
10.
Waldenberg C, Hebelka H, Brisby H, et al. Differences in IVD characteristics between low back pain patients and controls associated with HIZ as revealed with quantitative MRI. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0220952.
11.
Foltz MH, Kage CC, Johnson CP, et al. Noninvasive assessment of biochemical and mechanical properties of lumbar discs through quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic volunteers. J Biomech Eng 2017; 139: 1110021-1110027.
12.
Silcox DH 3rd, Horton WC, Silverstein AM. MRI of lumbar intervertebral discs. Diurnal variations in signal intensities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 807-811; discussion 811-812.
13.
Karakida O, Ueda H, Ueda M, et al. Diurnal T2 value changes in the lumbar intervertebral discs. Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 389-392.
14.
Danielson B, Willen J. Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 2601-2606.
15.
Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Elfering A, et al. Effect of aging and degeneration on disc volume and shape: a quantitative study in asymptomatic volunteers. J Orthop Res 2006; 24: 1086-1094.
16.
Yang SH, Espinoza Orías AA, Pan CC, et al. Spatial geometric and magnetic resonance signal intensity changes with advancing stages of nucleus pulposus degeneration. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18: 473.
17.
Boden SD, Riew KD, Yamaguchi K, et al. Orientation of the lumbar facet joints: association with degenerative disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 403-411.
18.
Boos N, Rieder R, Schade V, et al. 1995 Volvo Award in clinical sciences. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 2613-2625.
19.
Erkintalo MO, Salminen JJ, Alanen AM, et al. Development of degenerative changes in the lumbar intervertebral disk: results of a prospective MR imaging study in adolescents with and without low-back pain. Radiology 1995; 196: 529-533.
20.
Feng T, Zhao P, Liang G. Clinical significance on protruded nucleus pulposus: a comparative study of 44 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion and 73 asymptomatic control in tridimentional computed tomography. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi 2000; 20: 347-349.
21.
Gibson MJ, Szypryt EP, Buckley JH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of adolescent disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987; 69: 699-703.
22.
Greenberg JO, Schnell RG. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic adults. Cooperative study – American Society of Neuroimaging. J Neuroimaging 1991; 1: 2-7.
23.
Jarvik JJ, Hollingworth W, Heagerty P, et al. The Longitudinal Assessment of Imaging and Disability of the Back (LAIDBack) Study: baseline data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: 1158-1166.
24.
Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 69-73.
25.
Kanayama M, Togawa D, Takahashi C, et al. Cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging study of lumbar disc degeneration in 200 healthy individuals. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11: 501-507.
26.
Kovacs FM, Arana E, Royuela A, et al. Disc degeneration and chronic low back pain: an association which becomes nonsignificant when endplate changes and disc contour are taken into account. Neuroradiology 2014; 56: 25-33.
27.
Matsumoto M, Okada E, Toyama Y, et al. Tandem age-related lumbar and cervical intervertebral disc changes in asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 2013; 22: 708-713.
28.
Paajanen H, Erkintalo M, Kuusela T, et al. Magnetic resonance study of disc degeneration in young low-back pain patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989; 14: 982-985.
29.
Paajanen H, Erkintalo M, Parkkola R, et al. Age-dependent correlation of low-back pain and lumbar disc regeneration. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116: 106-107.
30.
Savage RA, Whitehouse GH, Roberts N. The relationship between the magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the lumbar spine and low back pain, age and occupation in males. Eur Spine J 1997; 6: 106-114.
31.
Stadnik TW, Lee RR, Coen HL, et al. Annular tears and disk herniation: prevalence and contrast enhancement on MR images in the absence of low back pain or sciatica. Radiology 1998; 206: 49-55.
32.
Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, et al. MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology 1998; 209: 661-666.
33.
Edmondston SJ, Song S, Bricknell RV, et al. MRI evaluation of lumbar spine flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals. Man Ther 2000; 5: 158-164.
34.
Zobel BB, Vadalà G, Del Vescovo R, et al. T1rho magnetic resonance imaging quantification of early lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in healthy young adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: 1224-1230.
35.
Takatalo J, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J, et al. Association of modic changes, Schmorl’s nodes, spondylolytic defects, high-intensity zone lesions, disc herniations, and radial tears with low back symptom severity among young Finnish adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: 1231-1239.
36.
Szypryt EP, Twining P, Mulholland RC, et al. The prevalence of disc degeneration associated with neural arch defects of the lumbar spine assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989; 14: 977-981.
38.
Carragee E, Alamin T, Cheng I, et al. Are first-time episodes of serious LBP associated with new MRI findings? Spine J 2006; 6: 624-635.
39.
Kjaer P, Leboeuf-Yde Ch, Korsholm L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 1173-1180.
40.
Hamanishi C, Kawabata T, Yosii T, et al. Schmorl’s nodes on magnetic resonance imaging. Their incidence and clinical relevance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994; 19: 450-453.
41.
Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, et al. Computed tomography-evaluated features of spinal degeneration: prevalence, intercorrelation, and association with self-reported low back pain. Spine J 2010; 10: 200-208.
42.
Dora C, Wälchli B, Elfering A, et al. The significance of spinal canal dimensions in discriminating symptomatic from asymptomatic disc herniations. Eur Spine J 2002; 11: 575-581.
43.
Rajeswaran G, Turner M, Gissane C, et al. MRI findings in the lumbar spines of asymptomatic elite junior tennis players. Skeletal Radiol 2014; 43: 925-932.
44.
Healy JF, Healy BB, Wong WH, et al. Cervical and lumbar MRI in asymptomatic older male lifelong athletes: frequency of degenerative findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20: 107-112.
45.
Capel A, Santonja Medina F, Medina D, et al. Magnetic resonance study of lumbar disks in female dancers. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 1208-1213.
46.
Weinreb JC, Wolbarsht LB, Cohen JM, et al. Prevalence of lumbosacral intervertebral disk abnormalities on MR images in pregnant and asymptomatic nonpregnant women. Radiology 1989; 170 (1 Pt 1): 125-128.
47.
Gwak GT, Hwang UJ, Jung SH, et al. Comparison of MRI cross-sectional area and functions of core muscles among asymptomatic individuals with and without lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20: 576.
48.
Kacar E, Unlu E, Beker-Acay M, et al. Age estimation by assessing the vertebral osteophytes with the aid of 3D CT imaging. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 2017; 49: 449-458.
49.
Van der Merwe AE, Işcan MY, L’Abbè EN. The pattern of vertebral osteophyte development in a South African population. Int J Osteoarchaeol 2006; 16: 459-464.
50.
Zukowski LA, Falsetti AB, Tillman MD. The influence of sex, age and BMI on the degeneration of the lumbar spine. J Anat 2012; 220: 57-66.
51.
Nathan H. Osteophytes of the vertebral column: an anatomical study of their development according to age, race, and sex with considerations as to their etiology and significance. JBJS 1962; 44: 243-268.
52.
Praneatpolgrang S, Prasitwattanaseree S, Mahakkanukrauh P. Age estimation equations using vertebral osteophyte formation in a Thai population: comparison and modified osteophyte scoring method. Anat Cell Biol 2019; 52: 149-160.
53.
Watanabe S, Terazawa K. Age estimation from the degree of osteophyte formation of vertebral columns in Japanese. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2006; 8: 156-160.
54.
Ricci C, Cova M, Kang YS, et al. Normal age-related patterns of cellular and fatty bone marrow distribution in the axial skeleton: MR imaging study. Radiology 1990; 177: 83-88.
55.
Blebea JS, Houseni M, Torigian DA, et al. Structural and functional imaging of normal bone marrow and evaluation of its age-related changes. Semin Nucl Med 2007; 37: 185-194.
56.
Laor T, Jaramillo D. MR imaging insights into skeletal maturation: what is normal? Radiology 2009; 250: 28-38.
57.
Griffith JF, Yeung DKW, Ma HT, et al. Bone marrow fat content in the elderly: a reversal of sex difference seen in younger subjects. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 225-230.
58.
Baum T, Rohrmeier A, Syväri J, et al. Anatomical variation of age-related changes in vertebral bone marrow composition using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat magnetic resonance imaging. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2018; 9: 141.
59.
Moulopoulos LA, Koutoulidis V. MRI of the normal bone marrow: anatomic sites. In: Bone Marrow MRI: A Pattern-Based Approach. Moulopoulos LA, Koutoulidis V (eds.). Springer Milan, Milano 2015. p. 25-34.
60.
Shah LM, Hanrahan CJ. MRI of spinal bone marrow: part I, techniques and normal age-related appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 1298-1308.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
