HEAD AND NECK RADIOLOGY / ORIGINAL PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Purpose:
This study aimed to compare the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to differentiate reactive lymphadenitis from nodal lymphoma of the head and neck.

Material and methods:
This study included 138 patients with histopathologically confirmed cervical lymphadenopathy, including 35 patients with reactive lymphadenitis and 103 patients with nodal lymphoma, who had neck MRI (n = 63) and/or 18F-FDG-PET/CT (n = 123) before biopsy. The quantitative and qualitative MRI results and maximum stan­dardised uptake value (SUVmax) were retrospectively analysed and compared between the 2 pathologies.

Results:
The maximum diameter (22.4 ± 6.9 vs. 33.3 ± 16.0 mm, p < 0.01), minimum diameter (15.8 ± 3.6 vs. 22.3 ± 8.5 mm, p < 0.01), and SUVmax (6.9 ± 2.7 vs. 12.8 ± 8.0, p < 0.01) of the lesion were lower in reactive lymphadenitis than in nodal lymphoma, respectively. T2-hypointense-thickened capsules > 2 mm (46% vs. 14%, p < 0.05) and T2-hypointense areas converging to the periphery (15% vs. 0%, p < 0.05) were more frequently observed in reactive lymphadenitis than in nodal lymphoma, respectively. Hilum of nodes on T2-weighted images (54% vs. 22%, p < 0.05) and diffusion-weighted images (69% vs. 30%, p < 0.05) were more frequently demonstrated in reactive lymphadenitis than in nodal lymphoma, respectively.

Conclusions:
Reactive lymphadenitis had a smaller size and lower SUVmax. The presence of T2-hypointense-thickened capsules, T2-hypointense areas converging to the periphery, and hilum of nodes were signs of reactive lymphadenitis.
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Kaji AV, Mohuchy T, Swartz JD. Imaging of cervical lymphadeno­pathy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1997; 18: 220-249.
 
2.
Weiss LM, O’Malley D. Benign lymphadenopathies. Mod Pathol 2013; 26 Suppl 1: S88-S96. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.176.
 
3.
Slack GW. The pathology of reactive lymphadenopathies: a discussion of common reactive patterns and their malignant mimics. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016; 140: 881-892.
 
4.
King AD, Lei KI, Ahuja AT. MRI of neck nodes in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the head and neck. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: 111-115.
 
5.
Abdel Razek AA, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, Alsharaway MK, Tawfik A. Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lympha­denopathy. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1468-1477.
 
6.
Chen J, Xu D, Sun WJ, Wang WX, Xie NN, Ruan QR, et al. Differential diagnosis of lymphoma with (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with fever of unknown origin accompanied by lymphadenopathy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149: 7187-7196.
 
7.
Som PM, Curtin HD, Mancuso AA. Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 837-844.
 
8.
Weber AL, Rahemtullah A, Ferry JA. Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the head and neck: clinical, pathologic, and imaging evaluation. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2003; 13: 371-392.
 
9.
Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T, Morikawa M, Uetani M, Kabasawa H, et al. Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1627-1634.
 
10.
King AD, Ahuja AT, Yeung DK, Fong DK, Lee YY, Lei KI, et al. Malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 2007; 245: 806-813.
 
11.
Holzapfel K, Duetsch S, Fauser C, Eiber M, Rummeny EJ, Gaa J. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 381-387.
 
12.
Schrepfer T, Haerle SK, Strobel K, Schaefer N, Halg RA, Huber GF. The value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of primary extranodal head and neck lymphomas. Laryngoscope 2010; 120: 937-944.
 
13.
Duvernay J, Schlund M, Majoufre C. Contribution of FDG-PET in the diagnostic assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OCSCC). J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 124 (6S): 101659. DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas. 2023.101659.
 
14.
Ryu KH, Yoon S, Baek HJ, Kim TH, Moon JI, Choi BH, et al. Cervical lymph nodes detected by F-18 FDG PET/CT in oncology patients: added value of subsequent ultrasonography for determining nodal metastasis. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019; 56: 16. DOI: 10.3390/medicina56010016.
 
15.
He L, Chen Y, Tan X, Sun X, Zhang Q, Luo H, et al. (18)F-FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of Castleman disease. Jpn J Radiol 2023; 41: 98-107.
 
16.
Rehal S, Stephens M, Roizes S, Liao S, von der Weid PY. Acute small intestinal inflammation results in persistent lymphatic alterations. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2018; 314: G408-G417. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00340.2017.
 
17.
Prativadi R, Dahiya N, Kamaya A, Bhatt S. Chapter 5 Ultrasound Characteristics of Benign vs Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2017; 38: 506-515.
 
18.
Ahuja A, Ying M. Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part II: abnormal lymph nodes. Clin Radiol 2003; 58: 359-366.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top