MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY / ORIGINAL PAPER
Sacralization may be associated with facet orientation and tropism but not degenerative changes of the lumbar vertebrae
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Radiology, Istanbul Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Submission date: 2020-11-12
Final revision date: 2021-01-26
Acceptance date: 2021-01-27
Publication date: 2021-06-25
Pol J Radiol, 2021; 86: 387-393
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the possible effects of transitional vertebra anatomy on facet joint tropism and orientation by evaluating lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies performed at our institution.
Material and methods:
We included 84 patients with sacralization of the L5 vertebra and an equal number of patients with a radiology report within normal limits as the control group in our study. We compared facet tropism (FT) and orientation between both groups.
Results:
In both the sacralization group and the control group, the facet orientation angle showed a significant increasing trend from the L1-L2 level to the L5-S1 level (p < 0.001). The orientation angle of the L5-S1 level was higher in the sacralization group compared to the control group (p < 0.01). In the evaluation of FJ orientation between the sacralization and control groups, we found that coronal orientation was significantly more frequent at the L5-S1 level in the sacralization group. When the 2 groups were compared with regard to tropism at each spinal level, the sacralization group had a significantly higher FT frequency at the L5-S1 level (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the relationship between sacralization and facet joint tropism. However, there were no relationships between facet degeneration, disc degeneration/herniation, and sacralization. Our results indicate that, although patients with sacralization and controls had similar characteristics in most assessments, they demonstrated significant differences at the L5-S1 level in terms of orientation and tropism.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Jentzsch T, Geiger J, Zimmermann SM, et al. Lumbar facet joint arthritis is associated with more coronal orientation of the facet joints at the upper lumbar spine. Radiol Res Pract 2013; 2013: 693971.
2.
Kalichman L, Hunter DJ. Lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis: a review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2007; 37: 69-80.
3.
Boden SD, Riew KD, Yamaguchi K, et al. Orientation of the lumbar facet joints: association with degenerative disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78: 403-411.
4.
Gao T, Lai Q, Zhou S, et al. Correlation between facet tropism and lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18: 483.
5.
Tulsi RS, Hermanis GM. A study of the angle of inclination and facet curvature of superior lumbar zygapophyseal facets. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993; 18: 1311-1317.
6.
Wang H, Zhang Z, Zhou Y. Irregular alteration of facet orientation in lumbar segments: possible role in pathology of lumbar disc herniation in adolescents. World Neurosurg 2016; 86: 321-327.
7.
Kalichman L, Suri P, Guermazi A, et al. Facet orientation and tropism: associations with facet joint osteoarthritis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: E579.
8.
Toyone T, Ozawa T, Kamikawa K, et al. Facet joint orientation difference between cephalad and caudad portions: a possible cause of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34: 2259-2262.
9.
Kim H-J, Chun H-J, Lee H-M, et al. The biomechanical influence of the facet joint orientation and the facet tropism in the lumbar spine. Spine J 2013; 13: 1301-1308.
10.
Konin G, Walz D. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: classification, imaging findings, and clinical relevance. Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 1778-1786.
11.
Chadha M, Sharma G, Arora SS, et al. Association of facet tropism with lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J 2013; 22: 1045-1052.
12.
Mahato NK. Facet dimensions, orientation, and symmetry at L5–S1 junction in lumbosacral transitional states. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: E569-E573.
13.
Schleich C, Müller-Lutz A, Blum K, et al. Facet tropism and facet joint orientation: risk factors for the development of early biochemical alterations of lumbar intervertebral discs. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016; 24: 1761-1768.
14.
Sekharappa V, Amritanand R, Venkatesh Krishnan KSD. Lumbosacral transition vertebra: prevalence and its significance. Asian Spine J 2014; 8: 51-58.
15.
Kong MH, He W, Tsai YD, et al. Relationship of facet tropism with degeneration and stability of functional spinal unit. Yonsei Med J 2009; 50: 624-629.
16.
Fujiwara A, Tamai K, An HS, et al. Orientation and osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; 385: 88-94.
17.
Dai L, Jia L. Role of facet asymmetry in lumbar spine disorders. Acta Orthop Belg 1996; 62: 90-93.
18.
Karacan I, Aydin T, Sahin Z, et al. Facet angles in lumbar disc herniation: their relation to anthropometric features. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 1132-1136.
19.
Gopalan B, Yerramshetty JS. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra-related low back pain: resolving the controversy. Asian Spine J 2018; 12: 407-415.
20.
Abbas J, Peled N, Hershkovitz I, et al. Is lumbosacral transitional vertebra associated with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis? Biomed Res Int 2019; 2019: 3871819.
21.
Luoma K, Vehmas T, Raininko R, et al. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra: relation to disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29: 200-205.
22.
Vergauwen S, Parizel PM, Van Breusegem L, et al. Distribution and incidence of degenerative spine changes in patients with a lumbo-sacral transitional vertebra. Eur Spine J 1997; 6: 168-172.